Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Redundancy issue


i have two layer 3 switches and 1 router with two ethernet interfaces.Can i configure redundancy for the router, so that if one switch goes down , other switch will take up the position.

Also , is etherchannel is beneficial between switch and router ????

Hall of Fame Super Bronze

Re: Redundancy issue

You could but keep in mind that you can't configure 2 IP addresses belonging to the same subnet on those ethernet interfaces.

Also, routers do not support etherchanneling.

New Member

Re: Redundancy issue

i am little sceptical about your statement , as interface Port-channel1 is used on routers and is for etherchanneling only.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Re: Redundancy issue

Etherchannel bundles 2 more ports, but you need tohave the ports connected to same device. With a router having 2 eth ports each connecting a separate switch, you cant configure channel. Secondly what is the use of configurung an etherchannel on router at one end thus pumping in data at high rate (gbps), while the output is only a few Mbps via serial or etherdrops.

One way of doing this is, take 2 subnets of /30. Assign it to 1 int each on eouter & the other Ip to each swith port to which router is connected. Then run a routing protocol among the 3 devices. This way you'll achieve load-balancing as well as redundancy.

hope that clarifies.

pls rate all helpful posts.