Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Remote router with 2 DSL connections - DMVPN and EIGRP

Hello,

I have a remote location that I am only able to get basic DSL Internet connectivity.  To try and improve performance I have installed two 1.5MB DSL connections to the same router.  I have created two seperate DMVPN tunnels back to two seperate hub routers at my main site.  When I bring up both connections the performance at the remote site actually gets worse not better,  noticably worse.  When i shut down one of the two DMVPN tunnels the performance gets better.

I have attached the relevant configs from the remote / spoke router and the two hub routers.  I would appreciate any help or guidance you can give me.

Thanks in advance.

Everyone's tags (3)
3 REPLIES
New Member

Re: Remote router with 2 DSL connections - DMVPN and EIGRP

Looks like you need to enable CEF load-sharing on each interface. Probably on a per-destination basis.

ip cef

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

ip load-sharing per-destination

!

interface FastEthernet0/1/1

ip load-sharing per-destination

Re: Remote router with 2 DSL connections - DMVPN and EIGRP

Hi,

You  might have a try to disable Virtual Fragmentation reassembly feature on  both Hub's interfaces (tunnel and physical) connected to Remote router.

Hub #1/2

int tun0

no ip virtual-reassembly

int f0/1

no ip virtual-reassembly

As it may cause some issues on assymetric paths. It is useful to be applied on firewalls to prevent some fragmentation attacks.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_vfrag.html

Hope it will help.

Hope it will help. Best regards, Abzal
New Member

Re: Remote router with 2 DSL connections - DMVPN and EIGRP

     srroeder,

          I don't know if you're still reading this, but if you are, then I have found what may well be your solution. I have just installed a very similar setup: a Cisco 2801 with two ADSL HWICs that go to the same ISP, but with different IP addresses. I tried CEF load-sharing, as I suggested in my earlier post, and it didn't work. So I had to use route-maps with tracking. It goes something like this (I've tried to customize it to match your config):

ip sla 1 

icmp-echo 151.1.1.x source-interface FastEthernet0/1

timeout 1000

threshold 40

frequency 3

ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now

ip sla 2 

icmp-echo 151.2.2.x source-interface FastEthernet0/1/1

timeout 1000

threshold 40

frequency 3

ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now

!        

!        

!        

track timer interface 5

!        

track 100 interface FastEthernet0/1 ip routing

delay down 15 up 10

!        

track 200 interface FastEthernet0/1/1 ip routing

delay down 15 up 10

!        

!        

!        

no ip classless

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/1 track 100

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/1/1 track 200

!        

!        

!        

route-map verizon0 permit 10

match ip address 100

match interface FastEthernet0/1

!        

route-map verizon1 permit 10

match ip address 100

match interface FastEthernet0/1/1


1246
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content