I was looking at injecting a conditional default route through RIP. I would like RIP to inject a default route if it sees 2 of its interfaces as UP. I am trying to make this work using (object tracking "AND" rule) and (default-information originate route-map CONDITION)
track 1 ip route 184.108.40.206 255.255.255.0 reachability
track 2 ip route 220.127.116.11 255.255.255.0 reachability
track 3 list boolean and
default-information originate route-map CONDITION
route-map CONDITION permit 10
match ip address prefix-list CONDITION
Now my question is if I use the below commands RIP doesnot inject a default route to its neighbor
ip prefix-list CONDITION seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Null0 track 3
But if I use the below commands RIP does inject a default route to its neighbor where 18.104.22.168/32 is just a dummy/fake route
ip prefix-list CONDITION seq 5 permit 22.214.171.124/32
ip route 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.255 Null0 track 3
I am unable to understand as to why RIP does not inject a default route if I match a default route in the CONDITION prefix-list. Could anybody please advise ?
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...