route-map clause action with match statements - is this true?
Please let us know if this is true or false.
When you have a route-map defining a clause with a deny statement on it and have an access-list that does not define anything, this route-map clause will not have any effect on the routes
route-map cisco deny 10
match ip address cisco
route-map cisco permit 20
set metric 20
ip access-list extended cisco
##implicit deny all##
This is because there is an implicit deny on the access-list and logically that will cause all traffic through the sequence to go on the next clause 20 and set metric to 20 for all routes.
However, if you have a similar scenario but do not actually define the access-list in cisco IOS 'ip access-list extended cisco' then the route-map logic will ignore that match statement and implicitly deny everything.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.