04-07-2006 02:47 PM - edited 03-03-2019 12:20 PM
Hello,
I want to implement a routing policy that forces all traffic with a certain destination port down one specific link of two wan links. However, should that one link go down, I would want traffic to roll over the other wan link. Is this possible with routing policies?
Thank you,
Tate
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-08-2006 01:41 PM
Hi,
You will need to configure your router as follows in order to get Citrix traffic to go over one link but fail over to the second link if the first goes down.
! track link one
track 123 rtr 1 reachability
! track link two
track 124 rtr 2 reachability
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map PolMap
!
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/2
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
ip access-list extended CitrixTraffic
permit tcp any any eq 1494
! add any other lines as necessary
!
route-map PolMap permit 10
match ip address CitrixTraffic
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.1.254 10 track 123
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.2.254 20 track 124
!
rtr 1
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 192.168.1.254
rtr schedule 1 life forever start-time now
!
rtr 2
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 192.168.2.254
rtr schedule 2 life forever start-time now
!
Pls do remember to rate posts.
Paresh
04-07-2006 03:05 PM
You can do this with PBR using multiple tracking options feature.
The link below should guide you through the process.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080211f5c.shtml
Pls. rate all helpful posts.
HTH,
Sundar
04-08-2006 10:42 AM
Thanks for the reply,
I already know how to do the object tracking with a routing policy, but I want to create a routing policy that sends all traffic of one type (citrix) down the first link, and then have it roll over to the second link if link one goes down. So would I have one policy for tracking, and one policy for my citrix traffic?
thanks,
04-08-2006 01:41 PM
Hi,
You will need to configure your router as follows in order to get Citrix traffic to go over one link but fail over to the second link if the first goes down.
! track link one
track 123 rtr 1 reachability
! track link two
track 124 rtr 2 reachability
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map PolMap
!
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/2
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
ip access-list extended CitrixTraffic
permit tcp any any eq 1494
! add any other lines as necessary
!
route-map PolMap permit 10
match ip address CitrixTraffic
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.1.254 10 track 123
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.2.254 20 track 124
!
rtr 1
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 192.168.1.254
rtr schedule 1 life forever start-time now
!
rtr 2
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 192.168.2.254
rtr schedule 2 life forever start-time now
!
Pls do remember to rate posts.
Paresh
04-08-2006 03:10 PM
Thanks!,
I actually thought of a different way to implement what I wanted to do, and this way I can verify that it works with a traceroute. I attached my network diagram. Since my citrix server is .34, I thought I could make traffic from .34 always go down the WAN but also fail over. Does this config look OK per the network diagram?
ip sla monitor 1
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.10.10.3
timeout 1000
threshold 2
frequency 2
ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip sla monitor 2
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.10.33.1
timeout 1000
threshold 2
frequency 2
!
!
track 10 rtr 1 reachability
!
track 33 rtr 2 reachability
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.200.6 255.255.254.0
ip policy route-map PolMap
duplex auto
speed auto
!
ip route 192.168.33.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.3 track 10
ip route 192.168.33.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.33.1 track 33
!
access-list 150 permit ip host 192.168.200.34 any
!
route-map PolMap permit 10
match ip address 150
set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.10.10.3 10 track 10
set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.10.33.1 20 track 33
I am using existing track objects for this, is that OK? I also already have redundant routes in for the destination network, do I need to change any ip route statements?
thank you very much.
04-08-2006 03:52 PM
Thanks so much guys!
It seems to work fine.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide