01-14-2007 05:57 PM - edited 03-03-2019 03:21 PM
Dear all,
Can anyone advise why the ping response is such a different for seg-loopback & end-loopback ping?
SING#p atm sw 1.1922 0 1922 end
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 53-byte end-to-end OAM echoes, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/28/28 ms
SING#p atm sw 1.1922 0 1922 seg
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 53-byte segment OAM echoes, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
01-14-2007 11:40 PM
Hello,
End loopback Verifies end-to-end PVC integrity and Segment loopback Verifies PVC integrity to the neighboring ATM device.
Fore more details:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a0080087c54.html
hope this will help.
rgrds,
01-15-2007 01:03 AM
Hey,
It helps a lot, thanks you so much!
11-05-2008 01:18 PM
So, if I have 4 ms in the seg-loopback and 60 ms in end-loopback, where is the problem?
Thank you
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: