01-14-2007 05:57 PM - edited 03-03-2019 03:21 PM
Dear all,
Can anyone advise why the ping response is such a different for seg-loopback & end-loopback ping?
SING#p atm sw 1.1922 0 1922 end
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 53-byte end-to-end OAM echoes, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/28/28 ms
SING#p atm sw 1.1922 0 1922 seg
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 53-byte segment OAM echoes, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
01-14-2007 11:40 PM
Hello,
End loopback Verifies end-to-end PVC integrity and Segment loopback Verifies PVC integrity to the neighboring ATM device.
Fore more details:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a0080087c54.html
hope this will help.
rgrds,
01-15-2007 01:03 AM
Hey,
It helps a lot, thanks you so much!
11-05-2008 01:18 PM
So, if I have 4 ms in the seg-loopback and 60 ms in end-loopback, where is the problem?
Thank you
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide