Maybe I should be calling support..but I dont' think this is a level 1 deal.
Basically this is a cut and paste from 2 lab 2811's with advanced ip. I don't beleive I have a tunnel established here. Can anyone see anything inherently wrong. This is pretty much a cut and paste deal. I've done some troubleshooting but I don't think any packets at all have passed over the tunnel that claims to be up. Just to be given a hint on direction here will be fine. These are back to back 2811's that can ping each other's serial interfaces.
i have done that thanks. I had the tunnel up briefly but I got lost in the weeds and rebooted...and it's gone. Thanks for your help...tomorrow's another day i guess and at least i'm not a contractor out in the feild with it....
Yes a tunnel has been succesfully negotiated. I am not sure why this is but maybe it's supposed to work this way....but when I try pinging the remote ethernet interface...it can't succesfully process the reply that it gets saying that it's not an ip sec packet.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.