YEAH . it will be a problem. You cannot have overlapping IP addresses on a site-to-site VPN. Your crypto ACLs cannot be defined if you have overlapping IP addresses. NAT the traffic at one end (preferably the destination) and then encrypt your traffic on the IPSEC.
Doing this, you can communicate between the LANs successfully. Hope this helps. rate replies if found useful. Let us know if you need more assistance on this.
oops. did i read the question wrong !!! if you have the PIX inside IP same at both the ends, i dont think you will have any issues. its the remote LAN subnet that matters the most here. PIX inside is anyway local to the locations, and does not come into picture for IPSEC connections.
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...