stable ios 2911 ?

[Tagir Temirgaliyev]

Hi all        

  we have 2911 with   HWIC-4ESW.

System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-1.T1.bin"

_2911#sh inv

NAME: "CISCO2911/K9 chassis", DESCR: "CISCO2911/K9 chassis"

PID: CISCO2911/K9      , VID: V05 , SN: FGL16011005

NAME: "4 Port FE Switch on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "4 Port FE Switch"

PID: HWIC-4ESW         , VID: V01 , SN: FOC15492WJV

NAME: "VWIC3-2MFT-T1/E1 - 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1 on Slot 0 SubSlot 1", DESCR: "VWIC3-2MFT-T1/E1

- 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1"

PID: VWIC3-2MFT-T1/E1  , VID: V01 , SN: FOC15472N9B

NAME: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels"

PID: PVDM3-64          , VID: V01 , SN: FOC154870QX

NAME: "C2911 AC Power Supply", DESCR: "C2911 AC Power Supply"

PID: PWR-2911-AC       , VID: V04 , SN: DCA1546R474

_2911#

the problem was that HWIC-4ESW no longer pass traffic although showing that the interfaces are up

rebooting the router solved the problem.

What IOS is more stable and not subject to this problem?

[Alessio Andreoli]

Hi there,

i had no issue with S29NPEK9-15202T but i honestly would not change IOS if i were you. maybe it was just a memory leaking or something that requires a deep troubleshooting and not the IOS itself. With the new license system then, everything is more expensive and as far as i understand, you are not totally sure the IOS is the problem... however, just to answer to your question, if you want to change go for the 'M' line. they generally are more stable than the 'T' line.

Alessio

[lkopacz14]

I have he exactly the same problem. Were you able to solve this?

Les

[Tagir Temirgaliyev]

Hi

now I use latest ios

System image file is "flash:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-4.M1.bin"

and no longer this problem with HWIC-4ESW