Static Route redundancy for connected route and vpn tunnel
I will try to make this question as simple as possible.
I have a ASA that is connected directly to a remote site via a p2p metro ethernet circuit. Therefore, the ASA has an interface on that "remote" network. In the firewall, the network is a connected route. I will use 192.168.1.0/24 as the network.
I want to create a redundant path to the remote site via a VPN over our Internet connections. How do I set up the tunnel and the routing to make this happen? I get the tunnel set up no problem. How do I get traffic destined for 192,168.1.0/224 to go over the VPN as opposed to the directly connected route when that connection fails?
Re: Static Route redundancy for connected route and vpn tunnel
The ASA has an interface belonging to the p2p link (not to the remote network), so you can have a VPN tunnel configured via another interface to reach that remote network.
However, the VPN tunnel will have to terminate on a different IP (not the other end of the p2p link), because the ASA will only use its own interface on the p2p link to reach the other end of the p2p link.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...