This is a routing question. I have seen this before on routers and on firewalls. Can someone explain why this happens or how I might go about debugging this?
We have a data center and part of the diagram is below.
We have a server that has to go through a Cisco 506 to another server connected to the 3750. This is behind an ASA5510. I have a static route on the 506 pointing to the 172.20.4.0/24 network which is on the 3750. If I have just an ip route 172.20.0.0/20 on the 506, the server can?t connect with the device on the 172.20.4.0/24 network. However, if I add or only have the ip route 172.20.4.0/24 on the 506?.traffic passes through just fine.
There is no outgoing access list. It just seems that the /20 should work. Is there a good reason for this to happen?
It does work with the 255.255.240.0 netmask. On rare occasions I will mistype something repeatedly even though I am staring at the keyboard. I think that is what must have happened. I appreciate your answer.....made me retry it.
This pix is unusual in that there is no config on it for nat (inside) 1 or nat (inside) 0. We do a static translation going into it from the outside. At some point...I must have pannicked.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.