First of all, excuse me for my English. I hope you could understand me.
Here is the issue.
I've got 3 ISP, The first ISP (ISP1) is used for SMTP (inbound & outbound) and webmail (https Inbound).
On the second ISP (ISP2) => Web (http, https, dns, msn, etc.) and Inbound VPN.
On the third ISP (ISP3), => Inbound FTP an dHTTP.
This configuration seems to works perfetly, but what i want to do is:
- Use the third ISP (ISP3) for inbound VPN.
- if it's not possible, use the third ISP for Web outbound protocol (http, https, etc.)
I configure Policy Based Routing.
My first attempt for inbound VPN on the third ISP was not a success. In fact, traffic go through the first SA (client => router) but is not re-encapsulate (router => client) in the second SA. So, i think that the default route is the problem ??
When i use "sh ip access-list" command, i never see change on my access-list for ESP traffic, ESP seems to not match this ACL (access-list 106).
For the second solution, (Outbound web access through the third ISP), PBR seems to works but i've the feeling that router doesn't do any NAT on Interface (FA 0/1)? It's really strange and i'm stuck in this !!
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.