we've got LLQ configured on a ATM interface for a ATM-Frame relay network supporting our remote sites and i would like to put some QoS on these interfaces. A typical sub-interface configuration looks like this:
interface ATM4/0/0.53 point-to-point
ip address 192.168.xxx.xx 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 190
ip policy route-map deny-dr
service-policy output llq
Policy Map llq
priority percent 50
bandwidth percent 30
What we're finding is that traffic in the highpriority class still gets affected when someone does a large file transfer which is in the default class. Have we implemented the service-policy output in the correct place (sub-interface) or should it be in the vc? Could it be anything else?
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...