I have been doing a little research on VRF lite and would like some clarification...
If there is an existing router with a standard configuration...and an admin wishes to add a new VRF to the physical box for one reason or another...
Do the exsiting interfaces need to be moved to a VRF as well? In my lab, it appears that the original configuration contains the "global routing table" and is, in essence, a "default VRF" for lack of a better term (I think I've seen references to a Management VRF?). The new VRF does appear to be isolated from the default/managment VRF.
Is it a best practice to not use the default/management VRF for production traffic? Or is it ok to keep the original config in place, "bolt on" the new VRF, and move on?
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...