I've got an issue where I've route leaked two static routes from VRF_A into VRF_B, but only one of them is being inserted into the routing table. If you look at the BGP table for VRF_B, you can see that 188.8.131.52/32 and 172.16.20.0/24 are in there, however only 172.16.20.0/24 is in the routing table. I need to be able to put 184.108.40.206/32 so it can perform recursive lookup.
Any help on why it's not inserting this BGP route into the RIB?
XXXXXX#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
Route Distinguisher: 6500:102 (default for vrf VRF_A)
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...