For long time I have been trying to implent a wccp to redirect traffic to an Ironport S160, but it´s very difficult, I have no more ideas what can be happen with.
The idea is that the users at branch network, transparently forward http traffic to Ironport web-cache.
The communication between sites is over VPN. I have two GRE tunnels running OSPF.
The ASA is not blocking anything between the sites.
I have estabilished communication with the Ironport and it seems packets are redirect, but the browser response timeout.
If I set proxy at browser It work´s normally.
I have tried to config service 99 and web-cache without access-lists and to apply redirect out on interfaces tunnel but nothing happen.
At Ironport, I set IP spoofing, configured other service ID, allow hash only, mask only and nothing.
! ip wccp check services all ip wccp 99 redirect-list ProxyList group-list IronWeb password xxxx ! ip access-list standard IronWeb permit 172.16.10.10 ! ip access-list extended ProxyList permit tcp 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 any eq www permit tcp 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 443 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip wccp 99 redirect in !
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.