WUG gives you more of a pictorial representation of the network topology which is very ideal to identify a failed device quickly
LMS on the other hand is a complete lan managament suite and has very rich features like backups, netconfigs etc.. (not sure if WUG also does this now but we primary use it for the reason i stated above
One has feature that the other don't have (vice versa). When comparing both products, you have to compare apple/apple - which mean the feature that the client required that both product can provide. Some people recommend/bought products that rich in features (for a cost) not necessary required initially telling/hoping that it will be needed in the future. In my experience, most of them never happen - at the end, the product becomes a white elephant (operational/maintenance cost).
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...