We run BGP over our WAN and we group our BGP neighborships into VRFs. But I was looking at the BGP network statements and I noticed that those are not defined under a specific VRF, but rather under the ipv4 address family. But if a network belongs to a specific VRF, shouldn't the BGP network statement be defined under that VRF?
Here's an example of how we have it configured:
router bgp 12345
network 10.10.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0
address-family ipv4 vrf Customer_A
neighbor 10.10.10.2 description *** CE router for Customer_A ***
So if the 10.10.10.0 network belongs to Customer_A, and Customer_A is in their own VRF, why would our network statement be in the VRF section? Why is it instead in the ipv4 section?
First you have a network statement for 10.0.0.0/24 in the global BGP RIB. Then you have a neighbor statement for 10.10.10.2 but I need to see the full config to see if it's iBGP or eBGP. It's possible that this 10.10.10.0/24 network is connected in VRF A or somebody made a typo when they put the network statement.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...