Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

New Wireless Security Risks

With the recent reports on wireless security and WEP being more "hackable," (,4586,5095205,00.html?chkpt=zdhpnews01) do the powers that be, at Cisco, still believe that LEAP is a secure alternative to WEP?

New Member

Re: New Wireless Security Risks

If you look an the Cisco WLAN security information I think you'll find the answer to be maybe.

For a average network with average data I think so. Changing the keys often will provide adequate security, however not without risk.

Cisco has also started recommending the use of a VPN to secure critical wireless communications. This recommendation came about shortly after the Berkley WEP (in)security paper was released. This VPN use stance also matches the Berkley researchers recommendations.

New Member

Re: New Wireless Security Risks

there is a new algorythm (I never can spell this right!!) to double hash the initialization vectors of the WEP keys. This will make WEP more secure. Also, by all means, use MAC filtering. Add LEAP on top of this, and you should be pretty secure. And remember, LEAP is not an alternative to WEP, but an add-on,

CreatePlease login to create content