Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hi,

I'm trying to install a static route when an IP address is not reachable, using IPSLA (ICMP echo) + tracking. I've found all the documentation  and know how to configure it, however I'm strugling to configure the IPSLA operation. For some reason it doesn't start, and returns the following message:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-AGR1#sh ipsla statistics 1000

Tue Jul 23 11:25:21.203 WEST

No information available. Specified operation is not configured or operation may have aged out

The configuration is pretty straightforward and I believe it is correct:

ipsla

operation 1000

  type icmp echo

   vrf iub

   source address 10.187.253.137

   destination address 10.187.253.138

   frequency 5

  !

!

!

ipsla

schedule operation 1000

  start-time now

  life forever

!

!

Could anyone help me find out what am I doing wrong?

Thanks.

Cheers,

Pedro

7 REPLIES
New Member
New Member

ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hi Hu,

I'm aware of the tracking configuration. My issue is with the IPLSA probe that doesn't start.

Thanks.

Cheers,

Pedro

New Member

ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hello Pedro,

There should be a problem with configuration vrf or OID typos, or the XR Version you are running doesnt support SLA.

You can verify the process status for ipsla using admin show proc | in sla

I have tried the above configuration you have - on IOX4.2.3

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:EQUINOX-A9k#show run ipsla

Mon Jul 29 05:35:31.670 UTC

ipsla

operation 1000

  type icmp echo

   vrf A

   source address 192.168.1.7

   destination address 192.168.1.1

   frequency 5

  !

!

schedule operation 1000

  start-time now

  life forever

!

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:EQUINOX-A9k#show ipsla statistics  1000

Mon Jul 29 05:35:53.130 UTC

Entry number: 1000

    Modification time: 05:30:29.383 UTC Mon Jul 29 2013

    Start time       : 05:30:29.387 UTC Mon Jul 29 2013

    Number of operations attempted: 65

    Number of operations skipped  : 0

    Current seconds left in Life  : Forever

    Operational state of entry    : Active

    Operational frequency(seconds): 5

    Connection loss occurred      : FALSE

    Timeout occurred              : FALSE

    Latest RTT (milliseconds)     : 1

    Latest operation start time   : 05:35:49.593 UTC Mon Jul 29 2013

    Next operation start time     : 05:35:54.593 UTC Mon Jul 29 2013

    Latest operation return code  : OK

    RTT Values:

      RTTAvg  : 1          RTTMin: 1          RTTMax : 1

      NumOfRTT: 1          RTTSum: 1          RTTSum2: 1

It shows no issues.

Thank You

Ahmed Moshref

New Member

ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hi Ahmed,

That's strange, I'm also running 4.2.3. Could you share the SMUs you have installed?

Regards,

Pedro

New Member

ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Check the

disk0:asr9k-mgbl-px-4.2.3

Thank You

Ahmed Moshref

New Member

Re: ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hi Ahmed,

I have that package installed:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR-LAB01#sh install active summary

Tue Jul 30 10:34:29.775 WEST

  Active Packages:

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCud37351-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCud29892-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-mini-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-doc-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCub22596-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-k9sec-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCuc17410-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-mpls-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-mgbl-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-mcast-p-4.2.3

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCud07536-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCub74517-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCub96985-1.0.0

    disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCud54093-1.0.0

I strongly believe that this might be a SMU related issue.

Thanks,

Pedro

New Member

Re: ASR9000 - IPSLA + Tracking

Hello Pedro,

On my lab , I dont have any SMUs installed- I still suspect the configuration.

Otherwise the only difference is the Card Type , I see yours are Trident cards, however it should be supported unless there is a missing SMU that solves a certain issue on that.

Thank You

Ahmed Moshref

2515
Views
0
Helpful
7
Replies