Based on this configuration would the class-default not utilize any existing remaining bandwidth as needed versus tail dropping as it is per the output below..? The end user is knowingly not tagging the COS 2 traffic correctly therefore causing much of the traffic to flow to the class-default bucket...although we will get this corrected I was wondering why the packets got dropped regardless of the tagging as I understood the class-default would consume remaining bandwidth. Is the bandwidth remaining and queue limit config lines as configured above putting restrictions on this capability? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have scrubbed lots of documentation but finding it hard to place my finger on something decisive.
Introduction: The "external-out enable" command is available for
configuration under the "router ospf process" in case of the IOS-XR
operating system. This command basically enables advertisement of
intra-area routes on the device as external routes in th...
IntroductionIn this article we'll discuss how to troubleshoot packet
loss in the asr9000 and specifically understanding the NP drop counters,
what they mean and what you can do to mitigate them. This document will
be an ongoing effort to improve troublesh...