There's a mobile version of our website.
What are the main differences between Cisco Unity and Cisco Unity Connection (version 7)
like : 1. In Cisco Unity, servers are in Active -Failover Mode and in Unity Connection, servers are in Active-Active mode
2. In Cisco Unity, there is Unified Messaging and in Unity Connection, Integrated Messaging
What is the major difference between Unified Messaging and Integrated Messaging ?
Please provide few more point of difference between the two............
If you are trying to decide which one to use please contact your local Cisco account team. They can give you a break down on what features each has as well as the direction they are going in the future which you will not find online to make sure you choose a product that lines up with your needs.
From Christopher @ Cisco in this great "Ask the Expert" event
In a Unified Messaging environment the voice messages are not actually stored on the voice mail server. They are stored on the Microsoft Exchange or IBM Lotus Domino mail store along with faxes and emails. End users can check voice, fax, and email all in one place from either the Telephone User Interface (TUI), or their Microsoft Outlook or Lotus Notes email client with very little configuration by the end user if any at all.
Unified Messaging has many benefits and allows customers to maintain a single directory and mail store however it does require you to have and maintain a Microsoft Exchange or IBM Lotus Domino mail server.
Cisco Unity Connection stores voice messages on the voice mail server itself. This reduces the complexities of installing and maintaining a Microsoft Exchange or IBM Lotus Domino mail server and at the same time for sites whom would like to access voice messages from their email clients, Connection provides a means of setting up an IMAP connection to the voice mail server to access voice messages. Visa Versa for customers whom wish to access emails from the Telephone User Interface (TUI), Connections allows clients to configure an IMAP connection to the email server.
Here is an excellent doc that highlights the differences;
Cisco Messaging Products: Feature Comparison
Read this blog. It will plainly explain the difference between Integrated Messaging and Unified Messaging.
This is a tech presentation that talks quite a bit about Unity Connection vs. Unity:
If you have further questions or are not sure which one may fit your needs, just ask.
Please rate helpful posts!
Message was edited by: David Hailey - Added tech presentation link
Biggest caveat that I see with customer as user functionlity pertains, is the ability to get the voicemail in your inbox on mobile phone users with Unity. Unfortunatley Connection requires IMAP connection, which is explained above in the other responses, which lacks the capability for voicemail by default to be dropped in the inbox, thus not making voicemail avaiable to mobile (cell) users with email capabilites on their phones.
This may well be true today but the gap may soon close...if not disappear. Cisco is currently in EFT (Early Field Trial) or "beta" trials for Unity Connection 8.5(1) which seeks to add Unified Messaging capabilities to Unity Connection using WebDav for Exchange 2003 and Exchange Web Services (EWS) for Exchange 2007/2010. Just a nugget to think about when you consider your customer's timing for install and what platform would be best suited to most environments. Take a look at this blog for more info/thoughts:
Please rate helpful posts!
Fine work here on the Blog and the excellent tech presentation! +5 points
all day long for this my friend
PS: Loved the reference to "Making fun of Bill Bell", it's very refreshing to see
people who work hard and take their jobs seriously can still have fun
Login to share your discussion activity with your friends on Facebook. You can control what you share and turn off sharing anytime.
Your Facebook friends can now see that you have started this discussion
Your Facebook friends can now see that you have commented on this discussion
Your Facebook friends can now see that you have read this discussion